![]() I know a number of people prefer FAS, but the split is something like 50/50. But this might mean they're going FAS with all future bodies. I was hoping Sony would stick to the tilt screen for stills oriented bodies, and leave the FAS for the video bodies like the A7s. While I wasn't going to swap my A7 III for the IV (not enough difference for me), I'm disappointed to see the fully articulating screen on the IV as well. So true cost to own vs what the individual photographer will actually do is my process. It can make that $2500 body $$$ more real fast if you like to have at least one back up card. ![]() There is also the expense of those CF express cards if that is an important factor. the extra mp of the A7iv is not enough to matter to me, I'd get the A7R IV if it was that crucial. I really like the "upgrade" of the A9ii over the A7iii. If the A7iv was an option with the A9ii I might had to really think about it all. There are those that will love the given newest camera and when we look back on the A7IV for the A7V in a couple years same type of thing.Īt the moment the A7IV is not for me as my A9ii is fairly new after selling my A7iii We will all have that deal breaker and things to become accustomed to. Using my cameras as cameras and not video I see the screen as a downgrade. Will keep shooting my 7III and hope that the a6600 replacement doesn't follow this path as well. I was so looking to upgrade my a7III but my style of shooting doesn't work at all with the flip out screen unfortunately.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |